Article 17 web tool

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The estimate of population size is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: 6.2. Due of the lack of data, we can not scientifically evaluate the population in the region in the recommended unit (i), so we took the number of grids 1x1 km as the minimum number of individuals. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The estimate of population size is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: 6.2. Due of the lack of data, we can not scientifically evaluate the population in the region in the recommended unit (i), so we took the number of grids 1x1 km as the minimum number of individuals. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: La especie se distribuye a lo largo del levante peninsular, ocupando cavidades en las estribaciones montañosas costeras normalmente por debajo de los 400 metros, desde Andalucía Oriental hasta el Norte de Cataluña, incluyendo las islas de Mallorca y Menorca en Islas Baleares.
Se han descubierto nuevas áreas y citas en algunas regiones, como en Valencia, en las cuales ha aumentado el rango de distribución de la especie.
Se ha citado en zonas interiores de Aragón o Castilla la Mancha (Alcalde et al., 2008, 2016; Lisón et al., 2012) por lo que el rango de distribución podría ser más extenso del actualmente conocido. ||
->Population: La Comunidad Valenciana alberga el mayor porcentaje de efectivos en la Península Ibérica con cerca del 50% (y cerca del 25% mundial). Le sigue Murcia con una población muy estable y numerosa que podría suponer alrededor del 30% del total. Andalucía sostiene el 13% del total, y el resto de colonias se reparten en Castilla la Mancha, Cataluña y Aragón, más las poblaciones de Mallorca y Menorca que aportan un 2%. ||
->HabInfo: Al ser una especie cavernícola, es muy vulnerable a la degradación del hábitat y a las molestias producidas por la actividad antrópica. La calidad del hábitat ha mejorado en Valencia y en otras regiones dadas las acciones de mejora y restauración, pero la tendencia es todavía desconocida a nivel peninsular.
El hábitat donde se refugia y alimenta ha disminuido, tanto en extensión como en calidad durante las últimas décadas (Palomo et al., 2007). ||
->Future: El aumento de los impactos y molestias en los refugios y cuevas producidos por actividades lúdicas como la espeleología o las visitas turísticas, el cierre de las cuevas de forma no adecuada o la degradación de los hábitats riparios son amenazas que pueden afectar a al especie de manera significativa en el futuro. ||
->Conclusion: Si bien las poblaciones de la Comunidad Valenciana se encuentran en un aceptable estado de conservación y en franca mejoría, el resto de las poblaciones ibéricas muestran un preocupante estatus de conservación. Esta especie es el único quiróptero con estatus 'En Peligro de Extinción' en el Catálogo Español de Especies Amenazadas. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: El murciélago ratonero patudo es la única especie de quiróptero ibérico con estatus de conservación 'En peligro de Extinción', incluido en el Catálogo Español de Especies Amenazadas.

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: Les récents atlas de mammifères (Corse - 2011, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur - 2016, Ardèche - 2007, Rhône-Alpes - 2014) permettent d'avoir une image à jour de la répartition de cette espèce. ||
->Population: Un des problèmes à résoudre pour cette espèce sera l'harmonisation de la méthode de comptage. Actuellement trois techniques sont utilisées : comptages des essaims et individus en cavités (sous-estiment les populations car les sites sont parfois difficiles d'accès et une partie des individus n'est pas visible car dissimulés en fissures) ; comptages en sorties de cavités (à priori les plus fiables compte tenu du comportement de sortie précoce des individus ... mais il faut trouver la bonne sortie et qu'il n'y en ait qu'une) ; le comptage de jeunes (ne donnent que les nombres de femelles et encore en les sous-estimant).
Il faudra aussi clarifier cette différence entre la population comptée par les groupes chiroptères sur toute l'aire de présence, et les estimations avancées en sites Natura 2000. ||
->HabInfo: Historiquement des habitats étaient occupés dans la Drôme, une bonne partie du Vaucluse, le Var et les Alpes-Maritimes, toutes zones d'où l'espèce a disparu. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: QA feedback - Confirmation de l'évaluation Défavorable-mauvais U2 pour les Perspectives futures - L'évaluation Inconnu ci-dessus pour les perspectives 2018-2030 reposerait surtout sur l'intensité des efforts qu seront faits pour cette espèce. Si des efforts sont faits (protection des sites, luttes contre les pollutions), alors l'espèce se maintiendra voire augmentera. Si rien n'est fait y compris en sites Natura 2000, l'état de l'espèce se dégradera. ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: Many unknown colonies may be present. Seasonal movements not taken in account. Min value estimated from roost counts, as well as capture and observation data at feeding sites, max from class 7. ||
->HabInfo: The surface area of the habitat is estimated at 72200 km2, the area of suitable habitat is 88775 km2 and its quality is moderate.
Forages almost exclusively above water surfaces. Water surfaces may be polluted or intensely and uncontrollably irrigated reducing water availability especially during dry seasons. Roosts in caves and mines which are abundant, but threatened. ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: For this species not enough data were collected during the period 2001-2014. Thus, the distribution, range, population size, habitat area and suitable habitat area were calculated or estimated using the most recent qualitative and quantitative data.

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: The estimate of population size is based on an extrapolation method or expert based judgement, using when appropriate the techniques suggested by the ETC. Such methodologies may have a degree of uncertainty that cannot be quantified; for this reason, the values included in the report are to be considered approximate estimates. ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report  

Scientific name used in original MS report if different than recommended: "Myotis capaccinii"
Information provided in the field 2.8.2: Reported additionnal information: ||
->Range: N/A ||
->Population: N/A ||
->HabInfo: N/A ||
->Future: N/A ||
->Conclusion: N/A ||
->JustificationThreshold: N/A ||
->Other: N/A

Open Original Report